B. H.
v.
FLORIDA

U.S. | 1995-06-12
No. 94-8194
515 U.S. 1132 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Sepulveda, 115 F.3d 882 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …utory language in this case is unambiguous the rule of lenily does not apply. .Criminal statutes must provide an “ordinary person with ... clear notice" of what is prohibited. Daniel v. City of Tampa, 38 F. 3d 546, 550 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132, 115 S.Ct. 2557, 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995). Section 1029 affords clear notice that it includes "any” means of account access that can be used in conjunction with another access device and would not lead an ordinary person to believe that the statute i…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw