ADAMS ET AL.

v.

DICKINSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Anthony v. Anthony, 949 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …re is simply no “case or controversy” between the parties presented by this appeal. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Kuhnlein, 646 So. 2d 717, 720 (Fla.1994) (“[E]very case must involve a real controversy as to the issue or issues presented.”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1158, [*228] 115 S.Ct. 2608, 132 L.Ed.2d 853 (1995); Warren Tech., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 937 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). To rule on the case at all, therefore, has no practical effect whatever and serves no purpose but the unworthy one of encouragin…
• State v. Seminole Tribe OF Florida, 720 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …ng to file suit challenging the constitutionality of the application of the sales tax, see Nemeth v. Florida Department of Revenue, 686 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 4th DCA) (relying on Department of Revenue v. Kuhnlein, 646 So. 2d 717 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1158, 115 S.Ct. 2608, 132 L.Ed.2d 853 (1995)), rev. granted, 697 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Jul. 29, 1997); it means only that the suit is not within section 72.011. As the lawsuit was not asserted to fall within any other statute waiving the DOR’s home venue pri…
• State of Fla. Dep't OF Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Sarnoff, 776 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
  …three-year time limit prescribed by section 215.26(2), Florida Statute. See id. The Nemeth decision was guided by the court’s earlier opinion in Department of Revenue v. Kuhnlein, 646 So. 2d 717, 725 (Fla.1994), cert. denied by Adams v. Dickinson, 515 U.S. 1158, 115 S.Ct. 2608, 132 L.Ed.2d 853 (1995). In Kuhnlein, the supreme court declared the impact fee statute to be facially unconstitutional, because it violated the commerce clause. Then in Nemeth, the court clarified the Kuhnlein decision, explaining:…