MARKMAN ET AL.
v.
WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1995-09-27
No. 95-26
515 U.S. 1192 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (U.S. 1996)
    …affirmed, holding the interpretation of claim terms to be the exclusive province of the court and the Seventh Amendment to be consistent with that conclusion. 52 F. 3d 967 (1995). Markman sought our review on each point, and we granted certiorari. 515 U. S. 1192 (1995). We now affirm. II The Seventh Amendment provides that “[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved . . . .” U. S. Const., Arndt. 7. Since Justice St…
  • Meghrig v. KFC W., Inc., 516 U.S. 479 (U.S. 1996)
    …ion of the “imminent endangerment” requirement represents a novel application of federal statutory law. We granted certiorari to address the conflict between the Circuits and to consider the correctness of the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of RCRA, 515 U. S. 1192 (1995), and now reverse. II RCRA is a comprehensive environmental statute that governs the treatment, storage, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. See Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund, 511 U. S. 328, 331-332 (1994). Unlike the Comprehe…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw