NEW YORK
v.
BANKS
NEW YORK
BANKS
516 U.S. 868
Supreme Court of the United States (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Smith, 919 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…oades v. Casey, 196 F. 3d 592 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 924, 121 S.Ct. 298, 148 L.Ed.2d 240 (2000); Estate of Altobelli v. Int’l Bus. Machs. Corp., 77 F. 3d 78 (4th Cir.1996); Mohamed v. Kerr, 53 F. 3d 911 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 868, 116 S.Ct. 185, 133 L.Ed.2d 123 (1995). A minority of the federal circuits follow the “plan document rule,” which holds that a waiver executed in conformance with plan requirements must be utilized when changing or removing a beneficiary. See McMill…