KRAMER
v.
TRIBE

U.S. | 1995-10-02
No. 95-264
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
516 U.S. 907 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Paladino v. Avnet Computer Techs., Inc., 134 F.3d 1054 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …ee, e.g., Graham Oil v. Arco Prods. Co., 43 F. 3d 1244, 1248-49 (9th Cir.1994) (arbitration clause that purported to waive federal statutory remedies and to shorten statute of limitations for filing statutory claims was unenforceable), cert. denied 516 U.S. 907, 116 S.Ct. 275, 133 L.Ed.2d 195 (1995); Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc., 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 138 (1997) (finding unconscionable and unenforceable an arbitration clause that, inter alia, limited remedy available in arbitration to a money a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw