IN RE BROWN; AND IN RE SMITH

Citator

Cited By

• S.G. v. C.S.G., 726 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
  …s private life." . Courts in jurisdictions without the broader guarantee of privacy included in the Florida Constitution, with one exception, see Broolcs v. Parkerson, 265 Ga. 189, 454 S.E. 2d 769, 773 (Ga. 1995), cert. denied, Parkerson v. Brooks, 516 U.S. 942, 116 S.Ct. 377, 133 L.Ed.2d 301 (1995), rev. granted, _, have rejected constitutional challenges to grandparent visitation statutes based solely upon Fourteenth Amendment grounds. See In re Petition of Santoro, 578 N.W. 2d 369, 375-376 (Minn.App.199…
• Troxel et vir v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000)
  …Ga. Code Atm. § 19-7-3(c) (1999), and it did so only after the Georgia Supreme Court held the State’s prior visitation statute invalid under the Federal and Georgia Constitutions, see Brooks v. Parkerson, 265 Ga. 189, 454 S. E. 2d 769, cert. denied, 516 U. S. 942 (1995). In light of the inconclusive historical record and case law, as well as the almost universal adoption of the best interests standard for visitation disputes, I would be hard pressed to conclude the right to be free of such review in all cas…
• United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456 (U.S. 1996)
  …demonstrate that the government has failed to prosecute others who are similarly situated.” 48 F. 3d 1508, 1516 (1995) (emphasis deleted). We granted certiorari to determine the appropriate standard for discovery for a selective-prosecution claim. 516 U. S. 942 (1995). Neither the District Court nor the Court of Appeals mentioned Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, which by its terms governs discovery in criminal cases. Both parties now discuss the Rule in their briefs, and respondents contend that it…