ORNELAS ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1995-11-06
No. 95-5257
516 U.S. 963 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1996)
    …upported the search. The Seventh Circuit held that determination not clearly erroneous. Judgt. order reported at 52 F. 3d 328 (1995). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict among the Circuits over the applicable standard of appellate review. 516 U. S. 963 (1996).4 Articulating precisely what “reasonable suspicion” and “probable cause” mean is not possible. They are commonsense, nontechnical conceptions that deal with “ The factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and…
  • …tegrated poultry producers are engaged in “agriculture.” See, e.g., Coleman v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., 629 F. 2d 1077, 1079 (CA5 1980); NLRB v. Ryckebosch, Inc., 471 F. 2d 20, 21 (CA9 1972). We granted certiorari to resolve the division of authority. 516 U. S. 963 (1995). II The NLRA’s protections extend only to workers who qualify as “employee[s]” under §2(3) of the Act. 29 U. S. C. § 152(3). The term “employee,” NLRA § 2(3) states, “[does] not include any individual employed as an agricultural laborer.” I…
  • Melendez v. United States, 518 U.S. 120 (U.S. 1996)
    …nce and requesting that the district court depart below the minimum of the applicable sentencing range under the Guidelines also permits the district court to depart below any statutory minimum.1 [*124] We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 516 U. S. 963 (1995). We now hold that such a motion does not authorize a departure below a lower statutory minimum. II The question presented involves two subsections of federal statutes and a policy statement of the Guidelines. Title 18 U. S. C. § 3553(e) pro…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw