NUMMER
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

U.S. | 1995-11-06
No. 95-400
516 U.S. 964 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Baker et. al. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1998)
    …litigate the issue, and there must be mutuality of estoppel.’ ” Nummer v. Treasury Dept., 448 Mich. 534, 542, 533 [*248] N. W. 2d 250, 253 (quoting Storey v. Meijer, Inc., 431 Mich. 368, 373, n. 3, 429 N. W. 2d 169, 171, n. 3 (1988)), cert. denied, 516 U. S. 964 (1995). “Although there is a trend in modern law to abolish the requirement of mutuality, this Court reaffirmed its commitment to that doctrine in 1971 in [Howell v. Vito’s Trucking & Excavating Co., 386 Mich. 37, 191 N. W. 2d 313]. Mutuality of est…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw