SIDEBOTTOM

v.

BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Citator

Cited By

• Richards v. Jefferson Cnty., 517 U.S. 793 (U.S. 1996)
  …a, we entered an order dismissing the writ to the extent that it included the equal protection question and directing the parties to address at oral argument only the question whether the application of res judicata afforded petitioners due process. 516 U. S. 983 (1996). Because petitioners raised their due process challenge to the application of res judi-cata in their application for rehearing to the Alabama Supreme Court, that federal issue has been preserved for our review. See PruneYard Shopping Center v…
• Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc., 517 U.S. 830 (U.S. 1996)
  …re deemed to be causes in fact, but not legal causes of the damage.” Id., at 576. Finally, the court held that under the circumstances of the case, the District Court’s bifurcation of the trial was not an abuse of discretion. We granted certiorari. 516 U. S. 983 (1995). II Exxon makes four arguments for the reversal of the judgment below: (1) that the superseding cause doctrine does not or should not apply in admiralty; (2) that respondents’ breaches of warranty were causes in fact of the loss of the Hous…