WILLIAM STACY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1970-06-17
No. 69-298
MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
237 So. 2d 189 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the appellant's attorney failed to properly certify service of the court's order allowing the appellant time to file his own brief.


Facts & Procedural History

The public defender filed an Anders-type brief stating the appeal was frivolous and requested to withdraw. The court ordered the public defender to se…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence from the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in and for Sarasota County, Florida. The public defender filed an “Anders type” brief1 wherein he stated that there was no merit to the appeal and that the appeal was frivolous. He then requested permission to withdraw as attorney of record in this matter.

This court issued an order on April 16, 1970 directing the public defender to serve a copy of the brief and a copy of the order on the appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested. The order allowed the public defender fifteen days in which to serve said brief and order and provided that the appellant would have thirty days from receipt of said order in which to file his brief or bring to this court’s attention any matter he wished this court to consider. See Leone v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 404; Daniels v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 405.

Appellant’s attorney has certified to this court that a copy of the brief has been furnished to appellant but he did not certify that a copy of this court’s order allowing *190appellant thirty days within which to file his own brief had been served on the appellant. Thus it is indicated that a material step required by our order in this appeal has been omitted.

We therefore direct that appellant be served by certified, return-receipt mail a copy of the order of April 16, 1970 forthwith, and that appellant’s attorney file a certificate of service in this court, setting forth the date of delivery of the April 16 order.

It is so ordered.

MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Prater v. State, 247 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Leone v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 404; Daniels v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 405; and Stacy v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So. 2d 189. LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw