MONTANA
v.
EGELHOFF
MONTANA
EGELHOFF
516 U.S. 1021
Supreme Court of the United States (1995)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1996)…ate had been “relieved of part of its burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged,” id., at 124, 900 P. 2d, at 266, and that respondent had therefore been denied due process. We granted certio-rari. 516 U. S. 1021 (1995). HH The cornerstone of the Montana Supreme Court s judgment was the proposition that the Due Process Clause guarantees a defendant the light to present and have considered [*42] by the jury “all relevant evidence to rebut the State’s eviden…
-
United States v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp., 517 U.S. 843 (U.S. 1996)…icies insuring goods in export transit violates the Export Clause. 31 Fed. Cl. 500 (1994). The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed. 59 F. 3d 1234 (1995). We agreed to hear this case to decide whether we should overrule Thames & Mersey. 516 U. S. 1021 (1995). HH H-l The Export Clause states simply and directly: “No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.” U. S. Const., Art. I, § 9, cl. 5. We have had few occasions to interpret the language of the Export Clause, but our ca…
-
United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., 553 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2008)…. In this case, the companies seek refunds for taxes paid between 1994 and 1996. At that time, the scope of the Export Clause was sufficiently debatable that we granted certiorari in 1995, see United States v. International Business Machines Corp., 516 U. S. 1021, and again in 1997, see United States v. United States Shoe Corp., 522 U. S. 944, to clear it up. What is more, the District Court that struck down the application of § 4121(a) to coal exports partially relied on these cases in arriving at its decis…