LOPEZ
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1995-12-11
No. 94-1432
516 U.S. 1022 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. US Infrastructure, Inc., 576 F.3d 1195 (11th Cir. 2009)
    …case here. In any event, Henson did not implicate any of the appellants in a crime. Thus, if his testimony was admitted in error, that error was harmless. E.g., United States v. Jones, 28 F. 3d 1574, 1582 (11th Cir.1994), vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1022, 116 S.Ct. 663, 133 L.Ed.2d 515 (1995). S. Appellants ’ Proffered Experts Various cash withdrawals from Singh’s funds were taken to India to finance Singh’s son’s wedding, which cost the Singhs between $180,000 and $190,000. Singh’s wife, Kusum Si…
  • Carroll v. Carman, 135 S. Ct. 348 (U.S. 2014)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw