CUDA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …the same whether the conduct occurs before or after the offense charged, and regardless of whether the activity might give rise to criminal liability.” United States v. Delgado, 56 F. 3d 1357, 1365 (11th Cir.1995) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1049, 116 S.Ct. 713, 133 L.Ed.2d 667 (1996). Those principles have been incorporated into the following three-step inquiry: First, the evidence must be relevant to an issue other than the defendant’s character; Second, the act must be established by suf…
• United States v. Abel Zapata, 139 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …uch evidence it intends to introduce at trial. The principles governing “other crimes” evidence is the same whether the conduct occurs before or after the offenses charged. United States v. Delgado, 56 F. 3d 1357, 1365 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1049, 116 S.Ct. 713, 133 L.Ed.2d 667 (1996). The “other crimes” evidence is evaluated under a three-part test: (1) the evidence must be relevant to an issue other than the defendant’s character; (2) the act must be established by sufficient proof to pe…
• United States v. Matos-Rodriguez, 188 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …ly for clear error, United States v. Gonzalez, 71 F. 3d 819, 836 (11th Cir.1996), but its interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines are reviewed de novo. United States v. Delgado, 56 F. 3d 1357, 1363 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1049, 116 S.Ct. 713, 133 L.Ed.2d 667 (1996). In that regard, we cannot say either that the district court’s factual conclusions concerning Matos’ possession of the firearm were clearly wrong, or that it was error to assess a two level enhancement pursua…