CORREA
v.
UNITED STATES
CORREA
UNITED STATES
516 U.S. 1060
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Alred, 144 F.3d 1405 (11th Cir. 1998)…nhancement). We further have concluded that arrangements between buyers and sellers, such as negotiating deliveries, are “simply incidental to the buyer-seller relationship.” United States v. Witek, 61 F. 3d 819, 823 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1060, 116 S.Ct. 738, 133 L:Ed.2d 688 (1996). In a continuing criminal enterprise, we have held that “evidence of fronting, without more, is insufficient to satisfy the management requirement.” Id. at 824. We conclude that the evidence presented by the…
-
United States v. Hanna, 153 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 1998)…-, 117 S.Ct. 1712, 137 L.Ed.2d 836 (1997); United States v. Sloan, 97 F. 3d 1378, 1383-84 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2459, 138 L.Ed.2d 216 (1997); United States v. Terry, 60 F. 3d 1541, 1544-45 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1060, 116 S.Ct. 737, 133 L.Ed.2d 687 (1996). In this circuit, only the court of appeals sitting en banc, an overriding United States Supreme Court decision, or a change in the statutory law can overrule a previous panel decision. See United States v. W…