BARR LABORATORIES, INC.

v.

BURROUGHS WELLCOME CO.; AND NOVOPHARM, INC., ET AL. V. BURROUGHS WELLCOME CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Tejada v. In re Forfeiture OF THE Following Described Prop.: $406, 820 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …United States v. Real Property Located at Incline Village, 47 F. 3d 1511, 1516 (9th Cir.1995). The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing; see Incline Village, 47 F. 3d at 1522; and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. Degen v. United States, 516 U.S. 1070, 116 S.Ct. 762, 133 L.Ed.2d 707 (1996). In Degen, the Supreme Court set forth to specifically answer the following question: whether the [fugitive disentitlement] doctrine should be extended to allow a court in a civil forfeiture suit to enter jud…
• United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (U.S. 1996)
  …Halper, supra, and Austin, supra, meant that, as a categorical matter, forfeitures under §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and 881(a)(6) always constitute “punishment.” We granted the Government’s petition for certiorari in each of the two cases, and we now reverse. 516 U. S. 1070 (1996). [*273] II The Double Jeopardy Clause provides: “[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” U. S. Const., Arndt.. 5. The Clause serves the function of preventing both “successive puni…
• Degen v. United States, 517 U.S. 820 (U.S. 1996)
  …District Court entered a final order vesting title to the properties in the United States. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. United States v. Real Property Located at Incline Village, 47 F. 3d 1511 (1995). We granted certiorari. 516 U. S. 1070 (1996). In an ordinary case a citizen has a right to a hearing to contest the forfeiture of his property, a right secured by the Due Process Clause, United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U. S. 43, 48-62 (1993); Fuentes v. Shevin, 40…