LOPEZ ET AL.

v.

MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 525 U.S. 266 (U.S. 1999)
  …very scheme that the County had effected through its consolidation ordinances and that appellants had challenged in their original complaint. This Court granted appellants’ emergency stay application and enjoined the proposed, eountywide election. 516 U. S. 1104 (1996). We subsequently noted probable jurisdiction over the appeal, 517 U. S. 1118 (1996), and we reversed, Lopez v. Monterey County, 519 U. S. 9 (1996). The District Court had erred, we concluded, in directing an election to take place under a sch…
• Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 519 U.S. 9 (U.S. 1996)
  …he very same scheme that appellants originally challenged under § 5 as unprecleared. On January 22, 1996, appellants filed an emergency application in this Court to enjoin the 1996 elections pending appeal. We granted the application on February 1, 516 U. S. 1104 (1996), and noted probable jurisdiction on April 1, 517 U. S. 1118 (1996). a > Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act applies whenever a covered jurisdiction “enact[s] or seek[s] to administer any . . . standard, practice, or procedure” different fro…