EINZIGER
v.
JACOBS ET AL.
EINZIGER
JACOBS ET AL.
516 U.S. 1116
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DOE v. Evans, 718 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…the church’s right to determine the standards governing the relationship between the church, its bishop, and the parish priest. Id. at 445. The court cited Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 194 Wis.2d 302, 533 N.W. 2d 780 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1116, 116 S.Ct. 920, 133 L.Ed.2d 849 (1996) (holding torts of negligent hiring, retention, and supervision as against church barred by First Amendment due to problems of excessive entanglement and chilling effect of award of damages, in context of adult…
-
Jane DOE I and Jane Doe II v. Malicki, 771 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…s Court will lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim. Accord, e.g., Scharon v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Presbyterian Hospitals, 929 F. 2d 360 (8th Cir.1991); Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 194 Wis.2d 302, 533 N.W. 2d 780 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1116, 116 S.Ct. 920, 133 L.Ed.2d 849 (1996). As the Fourth District said in Doe v. Evans, 718 So. 2d 286, 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), review granted, 735 So. 2d 1284 (Fla.1999): Our examination of case law presenting both sides of this question leads us to…
-
Castro v. State, 755 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…. Alternatively, the appellant argues that the use of a dog (referred to by the police as a K-9 unit) was beyond the scope of any consent given to the officers, relying primarily on State v. McLeod, 664 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1116, 116 S.Ct. 919, 133 L.Ed.2d 849 (1996). In McLeod, the trial court found that a consent to search obtained by the officer in that case encompassed a search of the interior of the vehicle but did not include a K-9 sniff search of the interior. Noting…