HOUSTON

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (U.S. 2003)
  …tires, and fired guns), cert. denied, 529 U. S. 1089 (2000); United States v. Stewart, 65 F. 3d 918, 922 (CA11 1995) (cross burning precipitated an exchange of gunfire between victim and perpetrators), cert. denied sub nom. Daniel v. United States, 516 U. S. 1134 (1996); United States v. McDermott, 29 F. 3d 404, 405 (CA8 1994) (defendants [*390] sought to discourage blacks from using public park by burning a cross in the park, as well as by “waving baseball bats, axe handles, and knives; throwing rocks and b…
• United States v. Loleta Allen-Brown, 243 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …district court’s finding as to the existence of a prima facie case.’ ” Cent Ala. Fair Housing Ctr., Inc. v. Lowder Realty Co., 236 F. 3d 629, 635-36 (11th Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 65 F. 3d 918, 923 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1134, 116 S.Ct. 958, 133 L.Ed.2d 881 (1996)). De novo review is inappropriate. See Stewart, 65 F. 3d at 923 (citing United States v. Moore, 895 F. 2d 484, 486 (8th Cir.1990)). A district court’s finding as to why a juror is excused is an issue of fact,…
• Transouth Fin. Corp. v. Bell, 149 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …urring in the result). We are not obligated to follow the plurality opinion in Vendo Co., because plurality opinions of the Supreme Court do not bind this Court. See, e.g., United States v. Stewart, 65 F. 3d 918, 924 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1134, 116 S.Ct. 958, 133 L.Ed.2d 881 (1996). We are obligated to follow a prior decision of this Court, see Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F. 2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc), and we do have a decision holding that the “aid of jurisdiction” exce…