IN RE HOLCOMB; IN RE SOLIMINE; IN RE TAL; AND IN RE MARTINEZ
IN RE HOLCOMB; IN RE SOLIMINE; IN RE TAL; AND IN RE MARTINEZ
516 U.S. 1145
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17 (U.S. 1997)…id. All of the dissenters, however, would have found that a much narrowed doctrine of equivalents may be applied in whole or in part by the court. Id., at 1540-1542 (opinion of Plager, J.); id., at 1579 (opinion of Nies, J.). We granted certiorari, 516 U. S. 1145 (1996), and now reverse and remand. II In Graver Tank we considered the application of the doctrine of equivalents to an accused chemical composition for use in welding that differed from the patented welding material by the substitution of one ch…
-
SSC Corp. v. Town of Smithtown, 517 U.S. 1150 (U.S. 1996)…9; 516 U. S. 1129; 516 U. S. 1132; 516 U. S. 1133; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1157; [*1152] No. 95-7380. No. 95-7388. No. 95-7402. No. 95-7470. No. 95-7489. No. 95-7567. No. 95-7611. No. 95-7624. No. 95-7631. No. 95-7788. No. 95-7813. 516 U. S. 1135; 516 U. S. 1145; 516 U. S. 1136; 516 U. S. 1138; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1150; 516 U. S. 1151; 516 U. S. 1163; 516 U. S. 1163; 516 U. S. 1157; and 516 U. S. 1166. Petitions for rehearing denied.…