FRIEND
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1996-03-04
No. 95-642
516 U.S. 1157 Supreme Court of the United States (1996) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (U.S. 1996)
    …s to engage in a consensual interrogation. Any attempt at consensual interrogation must be preceded by the phrase At this time you legally are free to go’ or by words of similar import.” Id., at 650-651, 653 N. E. 2d, at 696. We granted certiorari, 516 U. S. 1157 (1996), to review this per se rule, and we now reverse. to per se We must first consider whether we have jurisdiction to review the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision. Respondent contends that we lack such jurisdiction because the Ohio decision rested up…
  • …s interstate travel” or that it “provides services that are necessary for interstate travel,” the Court concluded that petitioner had [*571] “not met its heavy burden of persuasion that the statute is unconstitutional.” Ibid. We granted certiorari. 516 U. S. 1157. For the reasons that follow, we now reverse. II During the first years of our history as an independent confederation, the National Government lacked the power to regulate commerce among the States. Because each State was free to adopt measures f…
  • SSC Corp. v. Town of Smithtown, 517 U.S. 1150 (U.S. 1996)
    …S. 1124; 516 U. S. 1124; 516 U. S. 1124; 516 U. S. 1125; 516 U. S. 1148; 516 U. S. 1125; 516 U. S. 1126; 516 U. S. 1126; 516 U. S. 1126; 516 U. S. 1127; 516 U. S. 1129; 516 U. S. 1129; 516 U. S. 1129; 516 U. S. 1132; 516 U. S. 1133; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1157; [*1152] No. 95-7380. No. 95-7388. No. 95-7402. No. 95-7470. No. 95-7489. No. 95-7567. No. 95-7611. No. 95-7624. No. 95-7631. No. 95-7788. No. 95-7813. 516 U. S. 1135; 516 U. S. 1145; 516 U. S. 1136; 516 U. S. 1138; 516 U. S. 1149; 516 U. S. 1150; 5…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw