UNITED STATES
v.
URSERY; UNITED STATES V. $405,089.23 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY ET AL.

U.S. | 1996-03-25
Nos. 95-345; No. 95-346
517 U.S. 1102 Supreme Court of the United States (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (U.S. 1997)
    …n of the ESA, 16 U. S. C. § 1540(g), and that “only plaintiffs who allege an interest in the preservation of endangered species fall within the zone of interests protected by the ESA,” 63 F. 3d, at 919 (emphasis in original). We granted certiorari. 517 U. S. 1102 (1996). In this Court, petitioners raise two questions: first, whether the prudential standing rule known as the “zone of interests” test applies to claims brought under the citizen-suit provision of the ESA; and second, if so, whether petitioners…
  • …his Court granted the petition and requested the parties to brief as threshold matters (1) the standing of AOE and Park to proceed in this action as defending parties, and (2) Yniguez’s continuing satisfaction of the case-or-controversy requirement. 517 U. S. 1102 (1996). ) — 4 t — < Article III, § 2, of the Constitution confines federal courts to the decision of “Cases” or “Controversies.” Standing to sue or defend is an aspect of the case-or-controversy requirement. Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated G…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw