RODRIGUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Buford v. United States, 532 U.S. 59 (U.S. 2001)
  …v. Mapp, 170 F. 3d 328,338 (CA2) (same), cert. denied, 528 U. S. 901 (1999); United States v. Maza, 93 F. 3d 1390, 1400 (CA8 1996) (same), cert. denied, 519 U. S. 1138 (1997); United States v. Mullens, 65 F. 3d 1560, 1565 (CA11 1995), cert. denied, 517 U. S. 1112 (1996) (same), with United States v. Garcia, 962 F. 2d 479, 481 (CA5) (relatedness determination reviewed de novo), cert. denied, 506 U. S. 902 (1992); United States v. Davis, 922 F. 2d 1385, 1388 (CA9 1991) (same). II In arguing for de novo revie…
• United States v. Garrison, 133 F.3d 831 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …. Brunson, 54 F. 3d 673, 677 (10th Cir.1995)). This case involves the latter category. Because “there is a component of misplaced trust inherent in the concept of fraud,” United States v. Mullens, 65 F. 3d 1560, 1567 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1112, 116 S.Ct. 1337, 134 L.Ed.2d 487 (1996), a sentencing court must be careful not to be “overly broad” in imposing the enhancement for abuse of a position of trust or “the sentence of virtually every defendant who occupied any position of trust with a…
• United States v. Davis, 313 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …determine his criminal history. We review a district court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of the Sentencing Guidelines to those facts -de novo. United States v. Mullens, 65 F. 3d 1560, 1563-64 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1112, 116 S.Ct. 1337, 134 L.Ed.2d 487 (1996). When calculating a defendant’s criminal history, the sentencing court must add two points “if the defendant committed the instant offense ... while under any criminal justice sentence, including probation, pa…