ATHERTON ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR CITY SAVINGS, F. S. B.
ATHERTON ET AL.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR CITY SAVINGS, F. S. B.
517 U.S. 1133
Supreme Court of the United States (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe OF Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1997)…ficials. The Tribe originally sought to quiet its claim of title as against the State itself, but the claim was dismissed as barred by the Eleventh Amendment, see 42 F. 3d 1244, 1254 (CA9 1994), and we denied certiorari to review the dismissal. See 517 U. S. 1133 (1996). The principal opinion suggests without citation that “in the plan of the Convention” the States may not have consented to suits in federal courts against state officers that rest on the interpretation of federal law. Ante, at 274. Because a…
-
California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Constr., 519 U.S. 316 (U.S. 1997)…enticeship programs, and as to the reach of the saving clause — with that of the Eighth Circuit in Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. v. Minnesota Dept. of Labor and Industry, 47 F. 3d 975 (1995). We granted certiorari, 517 U. S. 1133 (1996), and now reverse. II Both lower courts determined, and neither party disputes, that the Electronic and Communications Systems JATC was a “plan, fund, or program [that] was established or is maintained for the purpose of providing for its pa…
-
Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1996)…of Appeals to vacate the District Court’s judgment — entered after several years of litigation and a six-day trial — on account of a jurisdictional defect cured, all agreed, by the time of trial and judgment. Pet. for Cert. 8. We granted certiorari, 517 U. S. 1133 (1996), and now reverse. II The Constitution provides, in Article III, §2, that “[t]he judicial Power [of the United States] shall extend ... to Controversies [*68] . . . between Citizens of different States.” Commencing with the Judiciary Act of…1 / 2