ALVAREZ
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1996-04-15
No. 95-7833
517 U.S. 1143 Supreme Court of the United States (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dolan v. State, 743 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …ch applies to photographic enlargements or blow-ups. Other jurisdictions addressing this issue have permitted the enhancements of computer enhanced videotape into evidence. In Nodner v. State, 322 Ark. 87, 907 S.W. 2d 677, 685 (1985), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1143, 116 S.Ct. 1436, 134 L.Ed.2d 558 (1996), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that where there is no evidence to indicate that the enhanced stills somehow changed a face, features, or physique, or were altered to include someone or something not present…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw