WILLIE O'HARA, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, the Florida District Court of Appeal granted Willie O'Hara's petition for a writ allowing him to pursue full appellate review of his criminal conviction. The court appointed a commissioner to hear evidence on O'Hara's habeas petition, and after the commissioner found his allegations credible, the court ordered that O'Hara be afforded full appellate review of his marijuana possession conviction.
The court held that O'Hara's petition stated facts which, if true, would prima facie entitle him to full appellate review as the equivalent of a direct appeal. After hearing evidence and receiving the Commissioner's findings that the allegations were true, the court granted O'Hara the opportunity for full appellate review of his conviction and sentence.
[1] A petition for writ of habeas corpus may be granted to provide appellate review of a conviction when the allegations in the petition, if true, would prima facie entitle t…
[2] A court may appoint a commissioner to take testimony and receive evidence regarding allegations made in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“facts which, if true, would prima facie entitle petitioner to a full appellate review as to the legality of his conviction by means of this habeas corpus proceeding as the [*561] equivalent of a direct appeal”
The court's standard for granting a habeas corpus petition—whether the facts alleged, if true, would warrant appellate review of the conviction's legality.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWillie O'Hara was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record in Hillsborough County, Florida on October 6, 1969, of possession of marijuana and sentenc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Orderly Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
In the above cause, on March 25, 1970, we issued writ of habeas corpus setting forth that the petition for the writ filed as an original proceeding in this Court by petitioner Willie O’Hara, stated “facts which, if true, would prima facie entitle petitioner to a full appellate review as to the legality of his conviction by means of this habeas corpus proceeding as the *561equivalent of a direct appeal.” Pursuant thereto, we appointed Hon. John G. Hodges, a Circuit Judge of the, 13th Judicial Circuit of Florida, as Commissioner “to take such testimony and receive such evidence as may be deemed proper and necessary as to petitioner’s allegations and thereafter with all convenient speed report the same, together with his findings and recommendations, to this Court.” 233 So.2d 429.
In accordance therewith Judge Hodges proceeded to hold such evidentiary hearing on May 6, 1970, and took and received sworn testimony from four witnesses, including Petitioner O’Hara. The testimony was transcribed and, on June 11, 1970, the transcribed report of testimony was filed in this Court, together with his findings that the allegations of the petition for writ were true, and his recommendations that Petitioner O’Hara “be granted full appellate review” as mentioned in our order of March 25, 1970, aforesaid.
Accordingly, we do herewith order that Petitioner Willie O’Hara be afforded the opportunity in this habeas corpus proceeding of full appellate review by this Court of the judgment and sentence of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, of October 6, 1969, wherein he was adjudged guilty of the offense of possession of marijuana and sentenced to five years in the State Prison.
In the interest of orderly procedure and for the sole purpose of accomplishing the foregoing objective the Petitioner is hereby granted leave to file directions to the Clerk, assignments of error, briefs, and transcript of record, in accordance with the provisions of PART VI, of the Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., all computations of time thereunder to commence from the date of this order.
HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.