AMPEX CORP.

v.

FRYMIRE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1996)
  …ether application of the Act suspended the writ of habeas corpus in this case, and whether Title I of the Act, especially the provision to be codified at § 2244(b)(3)(E), constitutes an unconstitutional restriction on the jurisdiction of this Court. 517 U. S. 1182 (1996). II We first consider to what extent the provisions of Title I of the Act apply to petitions for habeas corpus filed as original matters in this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2241 and 2254. We conclude that although the Act does impose n…
• In re Davis, 565 F.3d 810 (11th Cir. 2009)
  …warrant federal habeas relief if there were no state avenue open to process such a claim.” We likewise have recognized the possibility of freestanding actual innocence claims, see Felker v. Turpin, 88 F. 3d 1303, 1312 (11th Cir.1996), cert. granted, 517 U.S. 1182, 116 S.Ct. 1588, 134 L.Ed.2d 685 (1996) and cert. dismissed, 518 U.S. 651, 116 S.Ct. 2333, 135 L.Ed.2d 827 (1996), (“[Herrera] left open the difficult question of whether federal habeas courts may entertain convincing claims of actual innocence.”),…