C. G. REDSTONE, APPELLANT,

v.

REDSTONE LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, A CORPORATION; AND B. T. REDSTONE AND JOHN H. ATKIN, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, 105 Fla. 683 (Fla. 1931)
  …e officers of the church either had actual knowledge of what he did, or they should have kno'wn because it was their duty to know it, and “negligent ignorance has the same effect in law as actual knowledge.” Redstone v. Redstone Lumber & Supply Co., 101 Fla. 226, 133 So. 882. By acquiescing therein and accepting the benefits flowing therefrom, they ratified Oemler’s acts and now are estopped to deny his authority to bind the St. Stephens Episcopal Church. It follows that the appellant had, at the least, a…
• News-Journal Corp. v. Gore, 147 Fla. 217 (Fla. 1941)
  …re was no such conduct on the part of the minority stockholder as could be construed as acquiescence on his part, and as would have precluded him from successful complaint under the rule announced in Redstone v. Redstone Lumber & Supply Co., et al., 101 Fla. 226, 133 So. 882. Under the facts we think that the court may well have interfered with the salaries being paid (Neff v. Twentieth Century Silk Corporation, et al., 312 Pa. 386, 167 A. 578) and that it would have been proper for the decree to require a…
• Flight Equip. & Eng'g Corp. v. Shelton, 103 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 1958)
  …is State we have in accordance with this principle held that directors cannot fix their own salaries, as officers, unless expressly authorized to do so by the charter or the stockholders. Redstone v. Redstone Lumber & Supply Co., 1931, 101 Fla. 226, 133 So. 882, 884. The reason for the rule is so obvious as to require no explanation and the case at bar is good example of the wisdom and necessity for it. For if such were not the [*624] rule there would be no limit to the possible invasion of the corporate…