CAMPBELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Alred, 144 F.3d 1405 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …equently, less incarceration time. A district judge’s attribution of drugs to a particular defendant under the Sentencing Guidelines is subject to clearly erroneous review. See United States v. Reese, 67 F. 3d 902, 908 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1228, 116 S.Ct. 1866, 134 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). Facts considered at sentencing need to be proved by only a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Bennett, 928 F. 2d 1548, 1556 (11th Cir.1991). In reviewing a sentence under the Sentencing Gu…
• United States v. Osnel Coeur, 196 F.3d 1344 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …ich he was being sentenced while he was serving another criminal justice sentence. After hearing arguments on the issue by the parties, the court found the reasoning in United States v. Santana-Castellano, 74 F. 3d 593 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1228, 116 S.Ct. 1865, 134 L.Ed.2d 963 (1996), to be persuasive and assessed two additional criminal history points under § 4Al.l(d). II. On appeal, Coeur contends that it was improper for the district court to assess additional criminal history points…
• United States v. Khadijah S. Campbell, 139 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …ed, 506 U.S. 1011, 113 S.Ct. 632, 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992). A sentencing court’s determination of a defendant’s role in an offense is a factual finding reviewed for clear error. United States v. Reid, 69 F. 3d 1109, 1116 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1228, 116 S.Ct. 1866, 134 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). A district court’s legal conclusions in sentencing guidelines cases are reviewed de novo. United States v. Veloza, 83 F. 3d 380, 381 (11th Cir.1996). The district court denied CampbeU’s request for a mitiga…