PIERCE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Bd. OF Regents OF THE Univ. OF Ga., 263 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …eld that Justice Powell's opinion is not binding precedent, and that diversity is not a compelling interest. See Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F. 3d 932, 944 (5th Cir.) (“Justice Powell’s view in Bakke is not binding precedent on this issue.”), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1033, 116 S.Ct. 2581, 135 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1996); Grutter v. Bollinger, 137 F. Supp. 2d 821, 848 (E.D.Mich.2001) (concluding that "Bakke does not stand for the proposition that a university’s desire to assemble a racially diverse student body is a compellin…
• Nixon v. Shrink Mo. Gov't Pac, 528 U.S. 377 (U.S. 2000)
  …ribution limits, effective immediately. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit then held the initiative’s contribution limits unconstitutional under the First Amendment, Carver v. Nixon, 72 F. 3d 633, 645 (CA8 1995), cert. denied, 518 U. S. 1033 (1996), with the upshot that the previously dormant 1994 statute took effect. Shrink Missouri Government PAC v. Adams, 161 F. 3d 519, 520 (CA8 1998). As amended in 1997, that statute imposes contribution limits ranging from $250 to $1,000, dependin…
• Texas v. Lesage, 528 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1999)
  …hat “[t]he case at bar differs from Ada-rand because there is no allegation that the department of counseling psychology continues to use race-based admissions subsequent to the Fifth Circuit’s Hopwood v. State of Texas[, 78 F. 3d 932, cert. denied, 518 U. S. 1033 (1996),] decision.” Pet. for Cert. 13. The brief in opposition does not contest this statement. It therefore appears, although we do not decide, that Lesage has abandoned any claim that the school is presently administering a discriminatory admissio…