BOUNDS

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 79 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
  …ve an issue for appeal, the issue “ ‘must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation’ ”) (quoting Archer v. State, 613 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla.1993), cert. denied,, 519 U.S. 876, 117 S.Ct. 197, 136 L.Ed.2d 134 (1996)). The majority dismisses this point, stating that Appellant “specifically pled in her complaint that section 742.14 is unconstitutional, and it was adequately argued in the trial court .... ” (emphasis added).…
• Jenkins v. State, 837 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …la. 3d DCA 1996); Hardie v. State, 513 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), review denied, 520 So. 2d 586 (Fla.1988); Periu v. State, 490 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). See also Archer v. State, 673 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1996)(fundamental error), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 876, 117 S.Ct. 197, 136 L.Ed.2d 134 (1996). Affirmed.…
• Martinez v. State, 933 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …lude that the error was not fundamental error and, therefore, affirm. The Florida Supreme Court has consistently held that jury instructions are subject to the contemporaneous objection rule. See Archer v. State, 673 So. 2d 17 (Fla.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 876, 117 S.Ct. 197, 136 L.Ed.2d 134 (1996); Armstrong v. State, 642 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1085, 115 S.Ct. 1799, 131 L.Ed.2d 726 (1995); Parker v. State, 641 So. 2d 369 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1131, 115 S.Ct. 944, 130 L…