ALFRED E. GRIZZEL

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Avery W. Crawford and Lula Belle Crawford v. Fla. Steel Corp., 478 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …trol the details of work being done at the time of the accident resided in the alleged special employer. Rumsey, supra; Hamilton v. Shell Oil Company, 215 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), later appealed 233 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), cert. den., 237 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1970); see generally, 1C Larson, Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 48.00 (1985). The factors referred to are not equal, the first factor being the most important, and the second and third factors being merely indicators of the existence of the f…
• Fulton Thornton v. Paktank Fla., Inc., 409 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …to pay the workmen’s compensation insurance premium because the fee charged by the general employer is always set at an amount sufficient to include the cost of the premiums. In Hamilton v. Shell Oil Co., 233 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1970), which is the only Florida case on the subject, the court could not have reached the result that it did had it not believed that when the special employer contracted for the general employer to furnish workmen’s compensation coverage, it…
• Venezia v. Egan, 671 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …in the alleged special employer. Rumsey, [v. Eastern Distribution, Inc., 445 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) ] supra; Hamilton v. Shell Oil Company, 215 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), later appealed, 233 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1970); see generally, 1C Larson, Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 48.00 (1985). The- factors referred to are not equal, the first factor being the most important, and the second and third factors being merely indicators of the existence of the…

Authorities Cited

• Grizzell v. State, 233 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)