REESE

v.

JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Citator

Cited By

• Geralds v. State, 111 So. 3d 778 (Fla. 2010)
  …ggravating factor was error, but concluded that the error was harmless. Accordingly, we affirmed the death sentence. Id. at 103-04. The United States Supreme Court subsequently denied Geralds’ petition for writ of certiorari. See Geralds v. Florida, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). In September 1997, Geralds filed his original postconviction motion. In January 2002, Geralds amended his motion, raising twenty-six claims.7 In February [*786] 2003, after a Huff hearing, the circuit court…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. J.G., 740 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …ntially favorable testimony would have been forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice. Geralds v. State, 674 So. 2d 96, 99 (Fla.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). It follows that the trial court must consider these factors [*86] in determining whether to grant a continuance. The trial court did not do so here. Instead, it turned a deaf ear to the State’s arguments and…
• Geralds v. State, 237 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 2018)
  …ude that Geralds is not entitled to relief. Geralds was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. Geralds v. State , 674 So. 2d 96, 98 (Fla. 1996). Geralds' sentence of death became final in 1996. Geralds v. Florida , 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Geralds' sentence of death. See Hitchcock , 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Geralds' motion. The Court having carefully considered all argum…