INDIANA

v.

BRYANT

Citator

Cited By

• City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1997)
  …exceeded the scope of its enforcement power under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court certified its order for interlocutory appeal and the Fifth Circuit reversed, finding RFRA to be constitutional. 73 F. 3d 1352 (1996). We granted certiorari, 519 U. S. 926 (1996), and now reverse. II Congress enacted RFRA in direct response to the Court s decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith, 494 U. S. 872 (1990). There we considered a Free Exercise Clause claim brought by members…
• Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer, 520 U.S. 939 (U.S. 1997)
  …onduct and, if so, whether the Government’s release of its audits to Hughes employees constituted a public disclosure bar under the 1986 amendment and whether harm to the public fisc is an essential element of a qui tam action under the amended Act. 519 U. S. 926 (1996). Because we conclude that the lower courts should not have applied the 1986 amendment and therefore that this action should have been dismissed, we express no opinion as to the Ninth Circuit’s “public disclosure” and “public fisc” holdings, o…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Suitum v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1997)
  …sfer application there would be no “ ‘final decision from [the agency] regarding the application of the regulation^] to the property at issue.’”6 80 F. 3d 359, 362-363 (1996). We granted certiorari to consider the ripeness of Suitum’s takings claim, 519 U. S. 926 (1996), and now reverse. II The only issue presented is whether Suitum’s claim of a regulatory taking of her land in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments is ready for judicial review under prudential ripeness principles.7 There are two…