BOGGS

v.

BOGGS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1997)
  …3.” Ibid. He added that in his view, named exposure-only plaintiffs had no standing to pursue the [*612] suit in federal court, for their depositions showed that “[t]hey claimed no damages and no present injury.” Id., at 638. We granted certiorari, 519 U. S. 957 (1996), and now affirm. II Objectors assert in this Court, as they did in the District Court and Court of Appeals, an array of jurisdictional barriers. Most fundamentally, they maintain that the settlement proceeding instituted by class counsel an…
• Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (U.S. 1997)
  …Circuit has jurisdiction over the community property States of Louisiana and Texas, while the Ninth Circuit includes the community property States of Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, and Washington. Having granted certiorari to resolve the issue, 519 U. S. 957 (1996), we now reverse. II ERISA pre-emption questions are recurrent, two other cases on the subject having come before the Court in the current Term alone, see California Div. of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Constr., N. A., Inc., 519…