METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD CO.

v.

BUCKLEY

Citator

Cited By

• Lambrix v. Singletary, 520 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1997)
  …— the Court of Appeals proceeded to address the Espinosa claim, and determined that Espinosa announced a new rule which cannot be applied retroactively on federal habeas under Teague v. Lane, supra. 72 F. 3d 1500, 1503 (1996). We granted certiorari. 519 U. S. 958 (1996). II Before turning to the question presented m this case, we pause to consider the State’s contention that Lambrix’s Es-pinosa claim is procedurally barred because he failed to contend that the jury was instructed with a vague HAC aggra-vat…
• Cary Michael Lambrix v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 756 F.3d 1246 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …titioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The U.S. Supreme Court granted Lambrix’s petition on one issue not relevant to the instant proceeding and denied Lambrix’s counseled petition on all other issues. See Lambrix v. Singletary, 519 U.S. 958, 117 S.Ct. 380, 136 L.Ed.2d 298 (1996). The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the 1996 judgment of this Court. See Lambrix v. Singletary, 520 U.S. 518, 540, 117 S.Ct. 1517, 1531, 137 L.Ed.2d 771 (1997). E. 1990s Era State Post-Conviction Proc…