WALTON
v.
THROGMORTON

U.S. | 1996-12-02
No. 96-496
519 U.S. 1009 Supreme Court of the United States (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Cocoa v. Glynn Leffler, 762 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
    …mined by it. Id. at 48. Next, we note that Florida, like most states, follows pre-Erie3 United States Supreme Court decisions involving ownership of inventive rights. See Teets v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp., 83 F. 3d 403 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1009, 117 S.Ct. 513, 136 L.Ed.2d 402 (1996). The common law generally regards an invention as the property of the inventor who conceived, developed, and perfected it. See 30 C.J.S. Employer-Employee s. 117 (1992). Thus, the general rule is that employees…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw