SMITH
v.
RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; MARABLE V. MICHIGAN; HOLMES V. GRIFFIN; PIPPIN V. BENNETT; HINCHLIFFE ET UX. V. TRANSAMERICA FINANCIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO.; SUEHL V. SUEHL; COWHIG V. WEST, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL.; HOWARD V. TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL ET AL.; STROBRIDGE V. NEW YORK ET AL.; FARUQUI V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; WALTERS V. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.; GARZA V. UNITED STATES; HEMMERLE V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ET AL.; WARREN V. UNITED STATES; GODAIRE V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; MITCHELL V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; STEWART V. GRAMLEY, WARDEN; NOURAIE V. WEST, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY; KLOPP V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; JACKSON V. KESSLER; JONES, AKA LEE V. UNITED STATES; BABA V. WARREN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL.; BARBERENA-JIMENEZ V. UNITED STATES; KUMAR V. UNITED STATES; YURTIS, AKA COAN V. JONES ET UX.; NGUYEN V. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CARR V. LOUISIANA; AGUILAR V. NEW MEXICO; KRUEGER V. WOODS, WARDEN; FORTESCUE V. SIMPSON ET AL.; HARPER V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ET AL., IN RE WILLIAMS, SMITH V. NATIONAL CORPORATION OF HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS; TAYLOR V. LOUISIANA; BARTH V. UNITED STATES, IN RE GESCHKE ET UX., SCHIFFER V. TARRYTOWN BOAT CLUB, INC., ET AL.; WOLF V. BUSS AMERICA, INC.; WYSHAK V. AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F. A., ET AL.; GREENE V. CITY OF MONTGOMERY; ST. HILAIRE ET AL. V. MAINE REAL ESTATE COMMISSION; CORNISH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY; SCHAPIRO V. SCHAPIRO (TWO JUDGMENTS); ANDERSON V. FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., ET AL.; PHELPS ET UX. V. DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF ET AL.; BAKER V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL, ET AL.; DEMAREY V. UNITED STATES; OLIVER V. MAZURKIEWICZ, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW, ET AL.; NEWPORT V. MICHELIN AIRCRAFT TIRE, AKA MICHELIN TIRE CORP.; AYEBOUA V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.; HAYES V. CORRECTION MANAGEMENT AFFILIATES, INC., ET AL.; CHILDS V. OHIO ET AL.; MARTEL V. NEW HAMPSHIRE; CROWDER V. UNITED STATES; BRETSCHNEIDER V. BROWN; COOK ET UX. V. BOYD; DEMPSEY V. MASSACHUSETTS; TUGGLE V. NETHERLAND, WARDEN; STAUP V. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA ET AL.; WISHNATSKY V. BERGQUIST ET AL.; RICHARDS V. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; BROWN V. RUBIN, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL.; BECKER V. SOUTHWEST TRAVIS COUNTY ROAD DISTRICT NO. 1; BILLIS V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1996-12-02
Nos. 95-1246; No. 95-1821; No. 95-1851; No. 95-1944; No. 95-1964; No. 95-1970; No. 95-2001; No. 95-2046; No. 95-2089; No. 95-2092; No. 95-6127; No. 95-8346; No. 95-8811; No. 95-8905; No. 95-9013; No. 95-9058; No. 95-9100; No. 95-9106; No. 95-9130; No. 95-9132; No. 95-9133; No. 95-9156; No. 95-9158; No. 95-9165; No. 95-9255; No. 95-9283; No. 95-9337; No. 95-9364; No. 95-9433; No. 95-9452; No. 95-9457; No. 95-9461; No. 95-9469; No. 95-9487; No. 95-9496; No. 96-10; No. 96-57; No. 96-92; No. 96-96; No. 96-127; No. 96-158; No. 96-161; No. 96-314; No. 96-5062; No. 96-5092; No. 96-5094; No. 96-5095; No. 96-5096; No. 96-5106; No. 96-5122; No. 96-5142; No. 96-5152; No. 96-5177; No. 96-5196; No. 96-5275; No. 96-5314; No. 96-5320; No. 96-5364; No. 96-5367; No. 96-5390; No. 96-5410; No. 96-5419; No. 96-5477; No. 96-5480
519 U.S. 1022 Supreme Court of the United States (1996)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This Supreme Court order denied petitions for rehearing in over sixty cases that had previously been decided during the 1996 term, covering diverse legal matters involving federal and state administrative agencies, employment disputes, property issues, and constitutional claims.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

517 U. S. 1188; ante, p. 811; ante, p. 812; ante, p. 817; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 818; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 822; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 825; 516 U. S. 1050; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 828; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 834; ante, p. 836; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 838; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 948; ante, p. 840; No. 95-9158. No. 95-9165. No. 95-9255. No. 95-9283. No. 95-9337. No. 95-9364. No. 95-9433. No. 95-9452. No. 95-9457. No. 95-9461. No. 95-9469. No. 95-9487. No. 95-9496. No. 96-10. No. 96-57. No. 96-92. No. 96-96. No. 96-127. No. 96-158. No. 96-161. No. 96-314. No. 96-5062. No. 96-5092. No. 96-5094. No. 96-5095. No. 96-5096. ante, p. 841; ante, p. 841; ante, p. 846; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 856; ante, p. 857; ante, p. 858; ante, p. 806; ante, p. 859; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 860; ante, p. 861; ante, p. 864; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 866; ante, p. 867; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 931; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 878; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 879; ante, p. 879; No. 96-5106. No. 96-5122. No. 96-5142. No. 96-5152. No. 96-5177. No. 96-5196. No. 96-5275. No. 96-5314. No. 96-5320. No. 96-5364. No. 96-5367. No. 96-5390. No. 96-5410. No. 96-5419. No. 96-5477. No. 96-5480. ante, p. 879; ante, p. 880; ante, p. 881; ante, p. 882; ante, p. 883; ante, p. 885; ante, p. 889; ante, p. 891; ante, p. 892; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 894; ante, p. 895; ante, p. 896; ante, p. 897; ante, p. 933; and ante, p. 900. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw