HUMPHREYS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1996-12-16
No. 96-726
519 U.S. 1042 Supreme Court of the United States (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1999)
    …n “technical” or “other specialized [*147]” knowledge. Fed. Rule Evid. 702; compare, e. g., Watkins v. Telsmith, Inc., 121 F. 3d 984, 990-991 (CA5 1997), with, e. g., Compton v. Subaru of America, Inc., 82 F. 3d 1513, 1518-1519 (CA10), cert. denied, 519 U. S. 1042 (1996). II A In Daubert, this Court held that Federal Rule of Evidence 702 imposes a special obligation upon a trial judge to “ensure that any and all scientific testimony ... is not only relevant, but reliable.” 509 U. S., at 589. The initial qu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw