UNITED STATES

v.

O'HAGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Burger King Corp. v. C.R. Weaver, 169 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …is based on futility, i.e., inadequacy as a matter of law, we review such denial independently. Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A, 83 F. 3d 1317, 1323 (11th Cir.1996) (en banc), vacated on other grounds sub nom Hess v. F.D.I.C., 519 U.S. 1087, 117 S.Ct. 760, 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997). The trial court’s award of lost profits to BKC is also reviewed for abuse of discretion. “The damage provision of the Lanham Act entitles a trademark holder to recover, among other things, the profits earned…
• Harris v. Ivax Corp., 182 F.3d 799 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …n of whether a particular amendment to the complaint would be futile. See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 83 F. 3d 1317, 1323 (11th Cir.1996) (en bane), summarily vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom. Hess v. FDIC, 519 U.S. 1087, 117 S.Ct. 760, 136 L.Ed.2d 708, reinstated, 120 F. 3d 1140, 1145 (11th Cir.1997). II. DISCUSSION A. Overmen) The PSLRA made two changes to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that potentially affect the complaint here. First, the Act provides a…
• United States v. O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1997)
  …ourts of Appeals are in conflict on the propriety of the misappropriation theory under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, see infra this page and 650, and n. 3, and on the legitimacy of Rule 14e-3(a) under § 14(e), see infra, at 669-670. We granted certiorari, 519 U. S. 1087 (1997), and now reverse the Eighth Circuit’s judgment. II We address first the Court of Appeals reversal of 0 Ha-gan’s convictions under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Following [*650] the Fourth Circuit’s lead, see United States v. Bryan, 58 F. 3d 933,…