IN RE BARTH; IN RE TAMAYO; AND IN RE VISINTINE
IN RE BARTH; IN RE TAMAYO; AND IN RE VISINTINE
519 U.S. 1107
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (U.S. 1997)…not being able to adjust gasoline prices. We granted certiorari to consider two questions, whether State Oil’s conduct constitutes a per se violation of the Sherman Act and whether respondents are entitled to recover damages based on that conduct. 519 U. S. 1107 (1997). [*10] II A Although the Sherman Act, by its terms, prohibits every agreement “in restraint of trade,” this Court has long recognized that Congress intended to outlaw only unreasonable restraints. See, e. g., Arizona v. Maricopa County Medi…