LARRY

v.

PHILLIPS, CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. White, 321 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …mination. The district court held that plaintiffs challenge is not within the jurisdiction of the courts. The same challenge was made by a civilian employee of the United States Navy in Becerra v. Dalton, 94 F. 3d 145 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1151, 117 S.Ct. 1087, 137 L.Ed.2d 221 (1997). There the employee claimed the instigation of a security check that led to revocation of his security clearance constituted impermissible retaliation against him for filing an EEOC complaint. The Fourth Cir…
• Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Law Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1999)
  …respect to election processes generally. See Biddulph v. Mortham, 89 F. 3d 1491, [*192] 1494, 1500-1501 (CA11 1996) (upholding single subject and unambiguous title requirements for initiative proposals to amend Florida’s Constitution), cert. denied, 519 U. S. 1151 (1997); Taxpayers United For Assessment Cuts v. Austin, 994 F. 2d 291, 293-294, 296-297 (CA6 1998) (upholding Michigan procedures for checking voters’ signatures on initiative petitions).11 We have several times said "no litmus-paper test” will sepa…
• United States v. Yeager, 210 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …rt improperly relied upon his role in the overall RICO conspiracy to enhance his offense level for the drug convictions. The government relies upon the Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. Damico, 99 F. 3d 1431 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1151, 117 S.Ct. 1086, 137 L.Ed.2d 220 (1997), in support of its contention that Robert Yeager’s adjusted offense level for Group One was properly calculated. The court in Damico considered the issue raised by Robert Yeager in the instant appeal: Whether…