THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COMPLAINANT,

v.

THE STATE OF GEORGIA BILL IN CHANCERY

Citator

Cited By

• Missouri v. Ill. & the Sanitary Dist. of Chicago, 180 U.S. 208 (U.S. 1901)
  …ome of the later cases the contention has been the very opposite; that the intention of the Constitution was only to apply to questions in which the sovereign and political powers of the respective States were in controversy. In Florida v. Georgia, 11 How. 293, leav¿ was given by this court to the State of Florida to file a bill' against the State of Georgia, and process of subpoena was directed to be issued against the State of Georgia. The object of the bill was to ascertain and establish the boundary b…
• City OF Milwaukee v. Saxbe, 546 F.2d 693 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …id not allege facts from which a monetary value of the claim in excess of the jurisdictional amount could be inferred, relying on this court’s decision in Giancana v. Johnson, 335 F. 2d 366 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 1001, 85 S.Ct. 718, 13 L.Ed. 702 (1965). In Calvin v. Conlisk, 520 F. 2d 1, 8-9 (7th Cir. 1975) (Calvin I), vacated, 424 U.S. 902, 96 S.Ct. 1093, 47 L.Ed.2d 307 (1976), the panel’s opinion recognized that the Gautreaux affirmance could be viewed as a . departure from the “tough” a…
• State v. The State of Ga., 17 How. 478 (U.S. 1854)