GEORGE W. PHILLIPS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
JOHN S. PRESTON
GEORGE W. PHILLIPS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
JOHN S. PRESTON
11 How. 294
Supreme Court of the United States (1850)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 13 L. Ed. 702 · 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1511 · SCDB 1850-081
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Milwaukee v. Saxbe, 546 F.2d 693 (7th Cir. 1976)…id not allege facts from which a monetary value of the claim in excess of the jurisdictional amount could be inferred, relying on this court’s decision in Giancana v. Johnson, 335 F. 2d 366 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 1001, 85 S.Ct. 718, 13 L.Ed. 702 (1965). In Calvin v. Conlisk, 520 F. 2d 1, 8-9 (7th Cir. 1975) (Calvin I), vacated, 424 U.S. 902, 96 S.Ct. 1093, 47 L.Ed.2d 307 (1976), the panel’s opinion recognized that the Gautreaux affirmance could be viewed as a . departure from the “tough” a…
-
Rosado v. Wyman, 414 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1969)…tz v. Moffitt, 115 U.S. 487, 498, 6 S.Ct. 148 29 L.Ed. 458 (1885); First Nat. Bank of Youngstown v. Hughes, 106 U.S. 523, 1 S.Ct. 489, 27 L.Ed. 268 (1882); Giancana v. Johnson, 335 F. 2d 366 (7th Cir. 1964), cert denied, 379 U.S. 1001, 85 S.Ct. 718, 13 L.Ed. 702 (1965); Carroll v. Somervell, 116 F. 2d 918 (2d Cir. 1941); United States ex rel. Curtiss v. Haviland, 297 F. 431 (2d Cir. 1924); 1 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 0.92[5] (2d ed. 1964).” Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561, 564 (S.D.N.Y.1968), (three-judge c…
-
In re Haberman Mfg. Co., 147 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1893)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence