WILSON, BY AND THROUGH WILSON AS CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF WILSON, ET AL.
v.
BROTHER RECORDS, INC., ET AL.
WILSON, BY AND THROUGH WILSON AS CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF WILSON, ET AL.
BROTHER RECORDS, INC., ET AL.
520 U.S. 1103
Supreme Court of the United States (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lauri A. Ellis, 723 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1998)…Gaudin holding to prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1994). See, e.g., United States v. Klausner, 80 F. 3d 55 (2nd Cir.1996); United States v. Upton, 91 F. 3d 677 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Taylor, 66 F. 3d 254 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103, 117 S.Ct. 1105, 137 L.Ed.2d 307 (1997); United States v. Klais, 68 F. 3d 1282 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 94, 136 L.Ed.2d 50 (1996). .18 U.S.C. § 1001 provides: [Wjhoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any depart…
-
State v. Lauri A. Ellis, 722 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…limited the Gaudin holding to prosecutions under section 1001. See, e.g.. United States v. Klausner, 80 F. 3d 55 (2nd Cir.1996); United States v. Upton, 91 F. 3d 677 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Taylor, 66 F. 3d 254 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103, 117 S.Ct. 1105, 137 L.Ed.2d 307 (1997); United States v. Klais, 68 F. 3d 1282 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 94, 136 L.Ed.2d 50 (1996). .During the course of the investigation in connection with this matter, an investigator drove…
-
Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 522 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1998)…acial rationality of the Board’s test for employer polling and the Board’s application of that standard to the facts of this case. The court enforced the Board’s bargaining order, over a vigorous dissent. 83 F. 3d 1483 (1996). We granted certiorari. 520 U. S. 1103 (1997). II Allentown challenges the Board’s decision in this case on several grounds. First, it contends that because the Board’s “reasonable doubt” standard for employer polls is the same as its standard for unilateral withdrawal of recognition…