TIDIK
v.
TIDIK; DROBNY ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; COULTER ET AL. V. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., INC., ET AL.; GOULDING V. UNITED STATES; BELL V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; MORRIS ET UX. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; COOPER V. MALONE ET AL.; PARKER V. NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; BAST V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT; WOMBLE V. NORTH CAROLINA; WRONKE V. CANADY; FOX V. UNITED STATES, IN RE DELESPINE

U.S. | 1997-03-03
Nos. 95-8502; No. 96-409; No. 96-423; No. 96-809; No. 96-835; No. 96-5170; No. 96-6427; No. 96-6517; No. 96-6617; No. 96-6668; No. 96-6737; No. 96-6813; No. 96-6932
520 U.S. 1110 Supreme Court of the United States (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF ST. Petersburg v. Kablinger, 730 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
    …circuit court granted Kablinger a summary judgment on the issue of the City’s liability, guided primarily by our decision in City of St. Petersburg v. Bowen, 675 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), review denied, 680 So. 2d 421 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1110, 117 S.Ct. 1120, 137 L.Edüd 320 (1997). The Bowen decision involved the same ordinance and statute at issue here, and it found there had been a compensable temporary taking under circumstances that were materially indistinguishable from those in thi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw