SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
NATHAN D. FORD, JR., APPELLEE; SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT, V. W. R. BRITT, APPELLEE
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
NATHAN D. FORD, JR., APPELLEE; SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A RAILROAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT, V. W. R. BRITT, APPELLEE
238 So. 2d 473
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1970)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Interlocutory appeal dismissed on authority of Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, 229 So.2d 275 (Fla.App.1970), cert. denied March 24, 1970, 237 So.2d 540 (Fla.), and Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, 224 So.2d 797 (Fla.App.1969).
JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Costa v. Costa, 429 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…chetti v. Giachetti, 416 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Foss v. Foss, 392 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Schemer v. Schemer, 336 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Brandon v. Faulk, 287 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974) [*1252] Fla. and McManus v. McManus, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). After the decision of the trial court in this case, the Florida Legislature enacted Chapter 82-96, Laws of Florida (1982), amending sections 61.13(2)(b) and (3), Florida Statutes (1981). In it the law makers declared: It is the…
-
Waszkowski v. Waszkowski, 367 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…si, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 166 So. 2d 591 (Fla.1964). I think therefore that, as in such cases as Jacobs v. Ross, 304 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Sharp v. Hixon, 293 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); and McManus v. McManus, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970), the modification should not be permitted to stand.…
-
Warren v. Warren, 475 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…and wife. The husband filed a timely appeal of this order. A trial court is vested with the power to restrict the removal of a child from a particular geographical area. Crumpton v. Crumpton, 443 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); McManus v. McManus, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). The party seeking modification of the restriction, however, carries the burden of showing by substantial competent evidence that a material change in circumstances has occurred and that the removal is in the best interest of the…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Yewell Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 224 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Shaw v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 229 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. Dade Cnty., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)
- Robinson v. Waldrep Dairy, Inc., 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1970)