IN RE CALDERON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811 (U.S. 1997)
  …Court issued its order, appellants filed a jurisdictional statement asking us to note probable jurisdiction, and on April 21, appellees filed a [*818] memorandum in response agreeing that we should note probable jurisdiction. On April 23, we did so. 520 U. S. 1194 (1997). We established an expedited briefing schedule and heard oral argument on May 27.2 We now hold that appel-lees have no standing to bring this suit, and therefore direct that the judgment of the District Court be vacated and the complaint dism…
• Clinton v. City OF NEW York, 524 U.S. 417 (U.S. 1998)
  …er holding that the Act is unconstitutional. Byrd v. Raines, 956 F. Supp. 25. In obedience to the statutory direction to allow a direct, expedited appeal to this Court, see §§692(b)-(e), we promptly noted probable jurisdiction and expedited review, 520 U. S. 1194 (1997). We determined, however, that the Members of Congress did not have standing to sue because they had not “alleged a sufficiently concrete injury to have established Article III standing,” Raines v. Byrd, 521 U. S. 811, 830 (1997); thus, “[i]n…