IN RE CALLINS

Citator

Cited By

• Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1998)
• Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (U.S. 1998)
  …work was not only consistent with the statutory language but conducive to efficiency, Judge Kozinski again dissented, relying on the texts of §§ 1407(a) and 1404(a) and a presumption in favor of a plaintiff’s choice of forum. We granted certiorari, 520 U. S. 1227 (1997), to decide whether § 1407(a) does permit a transferee court to entertain a § 1404(a) transfer motion to keep the ease for trial. II A In defending the Ninth Circuit majority, Milberg may claim ostensible support from two quarters. First,…
• United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (U.S. 1998)
  …, stressed that a defendant’s right to present relevant evidence is not absolute, that relevant evidence can be excluded for valid reasons, and that Rule 707 was supported by a number of valid justifications. Id., at 449-451. We granted cer-tiorari, 520 U. S. 1227 (1997), and we now reverse. II A defendant’s right to present relevant evidence is not unlimited, but rather is subject to reasonable restrictions.4 See Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U. S. 400, 410 (1988); Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U. S. 44, 55 (1987); Cham…