ONCALE

v.

SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (U.S. 1998)
  …cale, a male, has no cause of action under Title VII for harassment by male co-workers.” App. 106. On appeal, a panel of the Fifth Circuit concluded that Garcia was binding Circuit precedent, and affirmed. 83 F. 3d 118 (1996). We granted certiorari. 520 U. S. 1263 (1997). [*78] H-4 H-i Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides, in relevant part, that “[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer ... to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, cond…
• Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (U.S. 1998)
  …ers’ conduct, the court reasoned that the conduct was administrative, rather than legislative, because Roderick and Bogan “relied on facts relating to a particular individual [respondent] in the decisionmaking calculus.” Ibid. We granted certiorari. 520 U. S. 1263 (1997). II The principle that legislators are absolutely immune from liability for their legislative activities has long been recognized in Anglo-American law. This privilege “has taproots [*49] in the Parliamentary struggles of the Sixteenth and…
• California v. Deep SEA Research, Inc., 523 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1998)
  …leventh Amendment immunity in an in rem admiralty action depends upon evidence of the State’s ownership of the res, and to consider the related [*501] questions whether the Brother Jonathan is subject to the ASA and whether the ASA pre-empts § 6313. 520 U. S. 1263 (1997). II The judicial power of federal courts extends “to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction.” Art. III, §2, cl. 1. The federal courts have had a unique role in admiralty cases since the birth of this Nation, because “[mjaritime co…