OWENS

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rutherford, 175 F.3d 899 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …e guidelines definition of “crack” so ambiguous that the district court should have disregarded the increased crack-cocaine penalties pursuant to the rule of lenity, see United States v. Sloan, 97 F. 3d 1378, 1382 n. 8 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1277, 117 S.Ct. 2459, 138 L.Ed.2d 216 (1997). (7) When viewed in the context of the entire record, we find nothing improper about prosecutor’s remarks at closing that the agents failed to take photographs of the transaction because their lives were endan…
• Nichols v. Hopper, 173 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …e violation, then the order will not terminate. Section 3626(b)(2) of the PLRA thus “provides only the standard to which district courts must adhere, not the result they must reach,” Plyler v. Moore, 100 F. 3d 365, 372 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1277, 117 S.Ct. 2460,138 L.Ed.2d 217 (1997), and does not violate the separation of powers principles set out in Klein. We note that other circuits have reached the same conclusion. See Benjamin v. Jacobson, 172 F. 3d 144, (en banc) (2d Cir.1999); Impri…

  ← 1 / 2 →